Insolvency Vets Un-mothballed
By
Joe Average,
April 2008.
www.lifetoday.com.au
It seems that the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation is getting ready for more financial institutions to fail
as world credit markets convulse in the wake of the US housing collapse and a
flight from SIVs... structured investment vehicles which are highly leveraged,
complicated, based on assumptions now proven to be plain wrong, and now
considered “toxic”.
“The FDIC is looking to
bring back 25 retirees from its division of resolutions and receiverships.
Many of these agency
veterans likely worked for the FDIC during the late 1980’s and early 1990’s,
when more than 1,000 financial institutions failed amid the savings-and-loan
crisis.
‘Regulators are bracing for
well over 100 bank failures in the next 12 to 24 months’...”
Damian Paletta, Feb.27, 2008 Wall Street Journal.
Who would have thought we’d see
Bear Stearns (the fifth-largest US investment bank) start the cleansing process
off and fail after having survived the Great Depression and a dozen recessions
over the past 85 years. Bear shareholders were horrified to see their
investment vaporize from $170 twelve months ago to the $2.00 offered by JP
Morgan in a Fed-backed bail-out orchestrated to head off a full scale global
rout.
Meanwhile, Standard & Poor’s
has just downgraded Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers from “Stable” to
“Negative Outlook”, and some analysts are wondering whether Citibank (which two
years ago was leveraged 22:1 and is now leveraged 42:1) may be a good “short”.
Since the early 90’s the number of
FDIC employees has dropped from around 15,000 to some 4.500. The agency will
also need to seek outside help to enable it to properly oversee the 8,000 plus
financial institutions for which it insures accounts.
Looks like the staff at banks making
it onto the”high risk list” in the future might expect a visit from FDIC
regulators (some of whom just might have a kind of mothbally smell about them).
Asian Markets Hit the Wall.
Many analysts were counting on
Asian markets to “decouple” from the massive US economy and Europe should the latter stall and fall
into recession. The theory was that the Asian economies would simply switch
from their reliance on exporting manufactured goods to the West to selling to
their own increasingly-better-off citizens and to developing their local
service industries.
If anything, it looks like the old
theory that “if the US economy catches a cold, the rest
of the world catches pneumonia” still applies. Much of the wealth of the new
Asian middle class has suddenly vanished with the Shanghai Composite down 37%
from its peak, the Shenzhen All Share down 27%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng down a
third, Vietnam’s Ho Chi Minh Index slashed by 50 %, and India’s Sensex down
25%.
Yet despite this crash in Asian
share prices some analysts like Brett Arends (Wall Street Journal, March 22 2008) are warning “Asia still not cheap despite
big falls...On many long-term measures like price-to-sales and price-to-book,
for example, Chinese equities still look very expensive.” So rather than bottoming anytime
soon, these markets may have a lot further to fall.
The Federation of Hong Kong
Industries estimates sky-rocketing labour costs and raw materials prices will
result in the closure of 10% of the 70,000 Hong-Kong owned factories located in
the nearby Pearl River Delta region of China. Some factories will be relocated
deeper into inland China where costs are lower; others
will be moved to cheaper regions like Vietnam, while some will simply shut
down.
Now, with China’s house prices faltering,
property developers in “extraordinarily
difficult financial straits”, political unrest in Tibet, and their main customers sliding
into recession, China will be struggling to keep itself
afloat let alone take over as the new locomotive engine for the global economy.
The Big Freeze Continues.
Thornburg Mortgage became another
victim of “the worst (U.S.) housing market in a century...we are in a 100-year storm in the housing
finance industry” (Dick Syron, C.E. Freddie Mac) who went on to say... “We are not pretending the housing
downturn has come to a bottom or anywhere near it. To the contrary, we are
assuming that house prices have only fallen a third of their peak-to-trough
decline.”
Carlyle
Capital (a fund holding “triple-A rated paper” and geared 32:1) collapsed when
nervous lenders seized its assets knowing that a 3% fall in value would wipe
out the fund’s equity.
Frightened investors in other
funds rushed to cash out only to become “angry
investors” when their savings
were “frozen” by fund managers.
“ING freezes two Kiwi funds...
Angry New Zealand investors are questioning
why their ANZ (Australia & New Zealand Bank) financial advisers put them into funds now
paralysed by the credit crisis.... ING New Zealand announced it was
indefinitely suspending withdrawals. The funds were based largely on CDOs
(collateralised debt obligations) and CLOs (collateralised loan obligations).” Maria Slade, The Australian, March 14th 2008.
Many of the 8,000 investors were
retirees and had been assured by the bank’s financial advisers that ‘it’s as safe as being in the bank, but you
get 1 per cent higher’. One retired couple had put their entire life
savings into the fund only to see it lose 30% in value before being frozen. The
husband has since suffered a nervous breakdown.
“Too late to duck out of
Drake hedge fund... Many investors in a hedge fund run by Drake Capital
Management are trying to pull their money out. They are finding out hedge funds
love to take investor’s money but cannot always give it back... The New York money manager... is
struggling with losses related to the credit crunch, has received withdrawal
notices from about half its hedge fund investors... (so) has moved to halt withdrawals... from its $US2.7 billion Drake Global
Opportunities fund.
Drake is one of several
hedge fund firms that have locked in investors as markets have soured.
Drake was also likely to
stop investor withdrawals from its two other hedge funds.
On Tuesday, GO Capital
Asset Management (Amsterdam-based with $US870 million under management)...told investors it would suspend
redemptions until March next year. ”
Cassell
Bryan-Low, Gregory Zuckerman, Wall Street Journal, March 14th
2008.
Helpless investors are now finding
out that lurking amongst all the fine print of their fund’s prospectus is the
power to invoke a “gate” or freeze on withdrawals when assets can’t be disposed
of in an orderly fashion for a reasonable value (such as when too many
investors want to cash out at the same time).
As one fund manager explained... “It is a pre-emptive measure to
safeguard the interests of our investors.” Some funds
exercise the right to freeze withdrawals if more than around 20 % of investors
head for the exits. This not only protects the remaining investors but also
ensures the manager and the fund’s employees keep their jobs.
However, investors who didn’t
quite make it out in time may find themselves in the sorry state of not only being
unable to access their money, but having to pay ongoing management fees
throughout the freeze. They may also have to face seeing the asset value of the
fund plunge further; and if their luck really runs out may face the prospect of
their fund going into liquidation as did the two failed Bear Stearns’ funds
that folded nine months ago (and triggered the current crisis).
A Quickie 2-3 Week Crash?
The history books tell us that economic
booms and asset bubbles can often take quite a while to unravel and deflate.
Take, for example, the Great Depression.
After peaking in October 1929 at
381 (and not to be surpassed again until 1954), the Dow Jones took more than
two and a half years to bottom in July 1932 at just 41, a loss of approximately
ninety percent of its value. Investors fought doggedly and continued to “buy
the dips” as one “dead cat bounce” after another ground them lower and lower.
The “death of a thousand cuts” you might say.
So it is a bit bizarre to hear
someone like Macquarie Bank’s division director Lucinda Chan complaining that
the present stock market is “dysfunctional”
because confidence-sapped investors are fleeing to the safety of
cash...”Chan’s frustration in trying
to explain the falling prices to clients is palpable.
“We knew there would be a
pull-back, but I’d rather have the 1987 crash of two or three weeks and just
plummeting, then clean up the mess and let’s move on’...(I guess she means back to the
good old days of rising stock prices)...’But
this is like six months of nonsense. There are no margins to make money because
there’s more downside than there has been up days.” Lisa Macnamara, The
Australian March 8, 2008.
While Chan is fretting for her
“quickie crash” other brokers are stressing because “The man in the street doesn’t want to buy shares anymore...fear is
feeding on itself...There’s nothing short of a panic in leveraged financial
stocks.”
Central Banks to Monetize Debt?
The article by Chris Giles and Krishna Guha
on the Financial Times website
(March 21, 2008) seems to have caused quite a
stir... “Central banks on both sides
of the Atlantic are actively engaged in discussions about the
feasibility of mass purchases of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) as a possible solution to the credit crisis.
Such a move would involve the use of public funds to
shore up the market ... and restore confidence by ending the current vicious
circle of forced sales, falling prices and weakening balance sheets... taxpayers
would be assuming the credit risk.”
The report states that the Bank of England
seems “most enthusiastic to explore
the idea. The (US) Federal Reserve is open in principle to the possibility...but only as a
last resort. The European Central Bank appears least enthusiastic.”
Economist Adam Smith argued in his book “The Wealth of Nations” in 1776 that
the global economy was best left to “free
markets” and “the invisible
hand” where all individuals pursued their own self-interest un-hobbled
by too much government intervention.
The latest machinations of the Central Banks
will have Adam Smith rolling over in his grave. No “invisible hand” for them. Rather they are acting out in the
open, making it clear they may be prepared to buy up as much of the financial
world’s malinvestments as necessary to preserve the current world order, and
don’t mind if they stick taxpayers around the globe with the bill.
Interesting Quotes.
“The scariest thing I’ve read recently...Tim Geithner (president Federal Reserve Bank of
New
York) came as close as a Fed
official can to saying we’re in the midst of a financial meltdown.
The Fed’s latest plan is to turn itself into Wall
Street’s pawnbroker....$US200 billion may sound like a lot of money, but when
you compare it with the size of the markets that are melting down –there’s $11
trillion in US mortgages outstanding – it’s a drop in the bucket... we can only
hope that, in the end, a bail-out won’t be necessary. But hope is not a
plan.”
Paul
Krugman, The New York Times, Tuesday 11th 2008.
“If you have leverage, you’re stuffed.
There are people who have been hanging on by their
fingernails who can’t hold on much longer.”
Alex Allen (CIO), Eddington
Capital Management, Bloomberg, Wed. 12th 2008.
A UK Labour Party official...“Ordinary people have been scared by what
has happened here. One bank (Northern Rock) saved from collapse by nationalization; another near thing last week (UK’s biggest home mortgage provider
HBOS). People are saying, ‘What the
hell is going on? What the hell are you going to do about these cowboys? We
have to show them we are in charge.”
Geoff Kitney, Australian Financial Review March 26th
2008.
All the best, Joe.
www.lifetoday.com.au
Disclaimer: This newsletter is written for educational purposes
only. It should not be construed as advice to buy, hold or sell any financial
instrument whatsoever. The author is merely expressing his own personal opinion
and will not assume any responsibility whatsoever for the actions of the
reader. Always consult a licensed investment professional before making any
investment decision.