Perspectives on Uranium: Part 1
By George J. Paulos
Editor/Publisher
Freebuck.com
Uranium is an investment phenomenon. Take a look at
the chart below of uranium “spot” price for a breathtaking view of a wild bull
market.

In any wild bull market, wild stories get created to
justify ever-increasing prices. These are typically “sound-bite” stories that
can mobilize hot money from the investment public. I had followed the uranium
market as a technical trader and did not pay too much attention to the
fundamentals as long as the trend was up. Recent developments such as Cameco’s Cigar Lake mine flood ratcheted up the
hype surrounding uranium to a frightening level. So I decided it was time to do
an in-depth fundamental analysis of the uranium market to separate the facts
from the hype. This will not be a “bull or bear” analysis but a cool-headed
examination of both the opportunities and risks in the uranium market.
Because of its length, this article will be
published in 2 parts.
Uranium
Sources
Uranium has the chemical symbol U and is the heaviest of the 92
naturally occurring chemical elements. Natural uranium is slightly radioactive
with an average half-life of 4.2 billion years. Half-life is the time it takes
for half a sample to decay radioactively into another chemical element. The
longer the half-life of the element the less radioactive the element is.
Radioactivity is a normal part of the environment and is present everywhere. There
is a small amount of slightly radioactive potassium-40 in your body with a
half-life of 1.5 billion years. These low levels of radioactivity are not
particularly dangerous but uranium is toxic if ingested. The decay of uranium, thorium, potassium and other
radioactive materials in the Earth’s core is responsible for its interior heat
and creates the energy behind continental drift, volcanoes, and earthquakes.
Uranium comes in several forms called “isotopes”.
These isotopes are different in the number of neutrons in the nucleus of the
uranium atom. There are two isotopes contained in natural uranium designated
U-238 and U-235. Over 99% of natural uranium is U-238 and about 0.7% is U-235.
The half-life of U-235 is 700 million years, which makes it significantly more
radioactive than U-238. U-235 is “fissile” which means
that it can sustain a nuclear chain reaction. This makes U-235 valuable as
nuclear fuel, and also as an atomic weapon. The common U-238 isotope is also
referred to as “depleted”
uranium.
Refined
uranium is typically in the form of an oxide called U3O8
or “yellowcake”. After refinement, uranium goes through a process called
“enrichment” where the concentration of U-235 is increased for use as nuclear
fuel. Enrichment is an extremely difficult process that requires separation by
weight of two isotopes that differ in weight by only about 1%. Uranium enriched
to a concentration of 3-20% U-235 is called “low-enriched uranium” or LEU. Uranium
enriched above 20% is called “high-enriched uranium” or HEU. Uranium enriched
above 85% is weapons-grade. Enrichment is usually performed via either
centrifuge or gas diffusion processes. The depleted U-238 uranium is typically
stockpiled as waste.
Uranium
is not a particularly rare element; it is more plentiful than antimony, tin, cadmium,
mercury, or silver and is about as abundant as arsenic or molybdenum. However, concentrated uranium deposits that lend to
profitable mining are not common. Uranium is distributed worldwide and 21 countries export
uranium ore, with Canada, Australia and Niger being the three largest exporters
and the United States, Congo, South Africa, Gabon, Russia and China also having
significant deposits.
Primary Sources
Primary production of uranium is obtainted by
extraction from ores or other natural source. There are a number of mineral
ores that contain uranium. The most common is uranite, also known as
pitchblende. The largest known deposits of uranium ores are located in
Australia with almost 40% of global reserves. The largest single deposit is
located at the Olympic Dam in South Australia. The largest uranium mining
company is the Canadian Cameco (CCJ-NYSE).
Uranium
is mined via a number of methods including open-pit, underground, or in-situ.
Each has advantages and disadvantages. Uranium mining is dangerous. Extreme
measures must be taken to protect workers from toxic uranium ore dust and, more
importantly, radon gas that is always present as a decay product of uranium.
Uranium
is present in minute quantities almost everywhere. There are a number of
alternative sources of uranium that could be exploited at the right price. For
example, uranium is dissolved in seawater at a concentration of about 3mg per
cubic meter. This concentration, although low, is a potentially gigantic
resource and could theoretically provide for limitless supply if the technical
hurdles could be overcome. A Japanese study estimated cost of seawater
extraction at about US$120/lb, not too far from current prices. The US Dept. of
Energy also studied seawater extraction end estimated that the Earth’s oceans
contain some 2 billion tons of recoverable uranium. This is enough to support
6000 years of 300GW generation using modern reactors. There are several test
seawater extraction projects already in operation.
A
hidden source of uranium is in the fly ash residue from coal burning furnaces.
This fly ash is collected in scrubbers from smokestacks and disposed in storage
pits. The concentration of uranium in typical fly ash ranges from 30-100 parts
per million (PPM) but has been measured as high as 1500ppm. These huge fly ash
dumps contain a large uranium resource. Such a low concentration would be
unprofitable in a typical hard rock mine, but the soft fly ash could be extracted
competitively at the right price.
Secondary Sources
Secondary
sources of uranium are from stockpiles or recycled from previous use.
Traditional
nuclear power plants are quite inefficient at “burning” their uranium fuel load
and much of the U-235 fissile material is discarded as waste. This fuel is
recoverable in a procedure called “reprocessing”.
Many countries already perform reprocessing on their spent fuel to both
increase efficiency and reduce waste. The US has elected to store spent reactor fuel as waste since
the 1970s. US nuclear waste storage is a highly contentious issue
that could be solved by a political decision to recycle rather than discard
spent fuel.
Uranium is stockpiled globally as a both a strategic
metal and as a fuel. There are a number of different estimates of total global
supply but the true extent is unknown. Some studies suggest that total
above-ground supplies are in the range of 100 million lbs. At first glance, stockpiles
seem low considering that global consumption of uranium is currently around 180
million pounds. But these stockpiles represent a mix of natural, LEU, and HEU.
One pound of 20% HEU is equivalent to some 27 pounds of natural uranium as
measured by the critical U-235 content. Russia is estimated to have over 1
million lbs. of HEU in its strategic military stockpile. Assuming that Russian military
HEU is enriched to near bomb-grade, then this stockpile represents the
equivalent to 50-80 million lbs. of natural uranium. Any rigorous analysis of
uranium stockpiles must take into account enrichment grades.
Global stockpiles of “depleted” uranium are
estimated at 2.6 billion pounds. Although depleted uranium has had most of its
U-235 removed, there still remains residual U-235 content of around 0.2% that
can be recovered through re-enrichment. Russia has been doing this for
years using its excess enrichment capability. This is a huge resource that
becomes economic when market prices for uranium are high.
The current global arsenal of nuclear weapons is
another potential uranium secondary source. Million of pounds of HEU are
incorporated into nuclear weapons worldwide. In the 1990s, Russia dismantled a large part of
their arsenal and sold much of the uranium as nuclear fuel which glutted the
market. As these weapons age, the bomb materials become contaminated with decay
products so they will need to have their uranium cores reprocessed. If global nuclear
tensions subside, much of this uranium may end up in the fuel cycle for nuclear
reactors.
Uses of
Uranium
Prior to the nuclear age, uranium had very limited
usefulness. When mixed with silica, it makes a beautiful yellow or greenish
glass which has been long treasured by glassblowers and collectors. Uranium is
also used in some pottery dyes. The metal has some unique properties that make
it useful in armor-piercing artillery shells. Many armored tanks use a uranium
alloy to protect it from heavy artillery fire.
Uranium has its most important use in nuclear power
and weapons. The rare isotope U-235
has the ability to fission, which is the process of a uranium atom splitting in
two and releasing two neutrons that can cause more atoms to split in a chain
reaction. U-235 is the only naturally occurring substance with that property.
Fission releases an awesome amount of energy. One pound of U-235 releases as
much energy 700 tons of coal. The vast majority of uranium production goes to
fuel nuclear power plants. This makes uranium essentially a single-use
resource.
Nuclear
Reactors
Light Water Reactors
There are a number of designs for nuclear reactors
in operation today. The vast majority are called “light water” reactors
that use LEU uranium (typically 3% U-235) to sustain a continuous chain
reaction. Water in the reactor core is used as a coolant and as a “moderator”
to control the neutron flux to maximize the efficiency of nuclear fission. The reactor
generates heat which creates steam that runs a turbine for electrical
generation.
Although U-235 is its major fuel, the uranium 238
atoms also contribute to the fission process by converting to plutonium 239 —
about one-half of which is consumed with the reactor. Light-water reactors are
generally refueled every 12 to 18 months, at which time, about 25 percent of
the fuel supply is replaced. Spent reactor fuel is not completely exhausted. It
still contains about 1.8% of U-235 and a small percentage of fissile plutonium.
Spent fuel rods can be recycled to recover the remaining fissile fuel but the
US and other major countries have elected to dispose of them instead due to
cost and political pressure. Therefore the light water fuel cycle is very inefficient,
using only about 1% of the fuel potential and produces significant waste
byproducts that have been difficult to dispose of.
Heavy Water
Reactors
A more advanced design is called the “heavy water”
or CANDU reactor design. This
reactor utilizes heavy water as the neutron moderator instead of normal “light”
water. The important feature of the CANDU reactor is the ability to use natural
unenriched uranium as a reactor fuel. The CANDU design is dramatically more
efficient that traditional light water reactors. The traditional light-water reactor
burns very little of the “fertile” U-238. The common
U-238 isotope can be a primary fuel under the right circumstances and therefore
contains enormous untapped energy. The CANDU reactor can burn U-238 along with other
alternative fuels including thorium, plutonium, and even spent fuel from light
water reactors. The CANDU reactor design is inherently safer than light water
reactors because the low enrichment level of the fuel makes an uncontrolled
chain reaction almost impossible.
CANDU reactors are significantly more expensive to
build and maintain however. This is primarily due to the large supply of extremely
pure heavy water (D2O) required by the design. Refined designs have
been built that use less heavy water and retain many of the advantages of fuel
efficiency and flexibility.
Breeder
Reactors
A
third type of reactor is called a “Breeder reactor”. This
fast-neutron design uses its neutron generation capability to continuously
create fuel from “fertile” material. These fertile materials include U-238 and thorium (three times more
plentiful than uranium). The breeder reactor can create more fuel than it uses
by transmuting the fertile material into a fissile material such as plutonium
239 and U-233 by irradiation with fast neutrons. Irradiated materials are
periodically removed from the reactor and reprocessed into primary fuel.
Breeder designs are difficult to build and have some operational hazards. The
primary hazard is in the reprocessing of fertile fuels into highly radioactive
and dangerous materials such as plutonium. The breeder reactor has the
potential, however, to generate humanity’s energy requirements for centuries
using commonly available fuels.
New
breeder reactor designs such as the Integral Fast Reactor
(IFR) have been created that retain all fuels until completely burned down to
low level waste. The IFR is the “holy grail” of nuclear reactor designs that
operate at almost 99% fuel efficiency, require no reprocessing, and generate
only small amounts of low-level radioactive waste. The IFR breeder reactor
project in the US was cancelled in the 1990’s due to political pressure.
All
three basic reactor designs are currently in operation and do not represent
“speculative” technology. Nuclear reactor science and technology are very mature.
Refinements are coming faster in recent years due to increased research and the
availability of newer engineered materials. Global warming and high fossil fuel
prices are weakening the political opposition to nuclear power. Many
environmentalists have now become pro-nuclear, viewing it as the lesser of
evils. It is expected that the next generation of nuclear power plants will
operate safer and more efficiently than ever.
Nuclear Power Plant Construction and
Decommission
There are over 440 reactors operating
in the world. They represent a variety of designs but most use the light water
system which requires the standard 3% enriched uranium fuel.
Reactor
construction had been almost nil during the period from 1980-200, but the
recent steep rise in the cost of fossil fuels has re-ignited interest in
nuclear power. The greatest construction and planning activity is in the
developing world, most notably China, India, and Russia. The chart below shows the best information that I
could obtain about power plants currently under construction and planned in the
major nuclear countries.
|
|
Under construction
|
APPROVED or Ordered*
|
|
China
|
5
|
5
|
|
France
|
1
|
0
|
|
India
|
7
|
4
|
|
Japan
|
1
|
1
|
|
Russia
|
4
|
1
|
|
USA
|
1
|
0
|
|
|
|
*estimated
|
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_by_country
A
total of 28 reactors are in process of construction globally. Most of the new
reactors are being built with advanced designs that are much more efficient and
can utilize alternative fuels. It is difficult to project future uranium demand
from these new reactors since they can be operated in a number of different
modes with a variety of fuel configurations.
The
most aggressive nuclear expansion is in China where there are at least 20 additional nuclear power
plants proposed for construction in the next 20 years. These were not included
in the above chart since they are in the proposal stage and are not yet
approved or ordered. China has announced its intention to be completely nuclear
independent in the future, using its own sources of fuel and its own processing
facilities.
Many
of the reactors currently operating in the world are nearing the end of their
planned lifetimes. In the past, over 90 commercial reactors have been
decommissioned. The US and Russia have the oldest operating reactors that are likely to
be decommissioned in the near future. 6 reactors are in the process of being
decommissioned in the US. Figures from other countries are difficult to obtain
and are in constant change. Germany and Belgium are considering decommissioning their entire nuclear
program. Projections of future uranium demand must take into account the
reductions in consumption represented by reactor decommissioning.
****
In Part 2 we will look at uranium from an economic
and investment perspective.
Special thanks to Nuclear Materials Engineer Mark
Hugo for his technical assistance on this article.
George
J. Paulos is Editor/Publisher of Freebuck.com, a website devoted to wealth preservation and
enhancement using alternative investing approaches including precious metals and
natural resources.
Email
Freebuck.com
Website
Copyright 2007 George J. Paulos, All rights reserved.
The
information contained herein is deemed reliable but no guarantee is made about
its completeness or accuracy. The reader accepts this information on the
condition that errors or omissions shall not be made the basis for any claim,
demand or cause for action. Any statements non-factual in nature constitute only
current opinions, which are subject to change. The author/publisher may or may
not have a position in the securities and/or options relating thereto, &
may make purchases and/or sales of these securities relating thereto from time
to time in the open market or otherwise. Neither the information, nor opinions
expressed, shall be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any stock,
futures or options contract mentioned herein. The author/publisher of this
letter is not a qualified financial advisor & is not acting as such in this
publication. Investors are urged to obtain the advice of a qualified financial
& investment advisor before entering any financial transaction.