Short
Selling – Profit From a Stock Decline
Purchasing a stock is called going long in
the jargon of the investment industry. In a long trade, an investor purchases a
stock then sells it, hopefully for a profit. A short sale is the inverse
of the long position. The stock is sold first then bought back, hopefully at a
lower price and therefore a profit. In other words sell high, buy low. How can
an investor sell a stock that he or she does not own? Investment brokerages
always carry an inventory of stocks as part of their assets. Brokerages are
allowed to lend stock to short sellers who then sell the stock into the markets
with the understanding that the stock will be purchased back and returned to
the lender at some time in the future. The ability to sell a stock short allows
the investor to profit from a decline in stock price.
The terms “long position” and “short position” are
unfortunate because they are not the same as “long-term” and “short-term”
investing. The term “short sale” has nothing to do with the length of time the
position is held. A short position can
be held for an arbitrarily long period of time. Conversely a “long position”
can be held for an arbitrarily short period of time. Be aware of this confusing
terminology and be on the watch for improper usage.
The short sale technique is not difficult but is a
bit more sophisticated than the traditional stock purchase. If, for example, an
investor purchases a stock for $10 and sells it at $100, this would produce a
$90 profit. A short sale of a stock at $100 that was closed at $10 would
produce the same $90 profit. The trick in short selling is to identify good
opportunities for significant stock declines. Short selling is a strategy that
is best used within the context of a bear market. If most stocks are going
down, then the likelihood for a profitable short sale is high. A short sale in
the context of a bull market where most stocks are going up makes profit much
less likely. Within bull markets, most investments should be long. In bear
markets, most investments should be short.
Short positions are inherently riskier than long
positions. This is because a long position has a limited loss potential (a
stock can only go to zero) but unlimited gain potential since there is no
absolute limit to how high a stock can go. A short position has a limited gain
potential (a fully leveraged short sale has a maximum profit potential of 200%)
and an unlimited loss potential. This makes risk control an essential component
of a successful short selling strategy. Short selling is a very useful tool for
exploiting bear markets but also can be used as a hedging tool to minimize risk
against a long position in a bull market.
A hypothetical investor places $10,000 into a
brokerage account and receives a statement from the brokerage that looks like
this:
|
CASH
|
$10,000
|
|
Long positions
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
Short positions
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
$10,000
|
The investor performs a stock analysis and identifies
QCOM stock as a good short candidate by analyzing the technical condition of
the chart and the fundamentals of the market:

The investor then instructs the broker to sell short
100 shares of QCOM at $66.The investment account now looks like this:
|
CASH
|
$16,600
|

|
|
Long positions
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
Short positions
|
|
|
100 QCOM @$66
|
-$6,600
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
$10,000
|
Notice that the investor’s cash position has
increased by $6600. This is the money received from selling the stock. The short
position is logged as a debt, offsetting the increase in cash so that the total
account value remains at $10,000. Short positions are debts and are subtracted
from the account’s total equity. As the stock declines, the negative value of
the short position also declines resulting in an increase in account value.
To illustrate this, let’s follow QCOM stock as it
declines to $46. Then the investment account will look like this:
|
CASH
|
$16,600
|

|
|
Long positions
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
Short positions
|
|
|
100 QCOM @$46
|
-$4,600
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
$12,000
|
The decline in QCOM stock reduced the debt for the short
position, resulting in an increase of the total portfolio value to $12,000.
If the investor decides to close the position at
this time, the broker would be instructed to cover (buy back) the short
position in QCOM stock by buying 100 shares on the open market for $46. After
the order is executed, the account looks like this:
|
CASH
|
$12,000
|
|
Long positions
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
Short positions
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
$12,000
|
Purchasing 100 shares of QCOM stock at $46 required
$4600 from cash. This left $12,000 cash in the account resulting in a total
profit of $2000 for the trade.
Of course, if QCOM stock rises, the short position
will lose value. The risk in a short position is that it loses money when the
stock rises. In this way the short position works exactly opposite to the
direction of the stock.
For example, if we shorted 100 shares of QCOM at $40
and it rose to $60, the total account value would decline to $8000.
|
CASH
|
$14,000
|

|
|
Long positions
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
Short positions
|
|
|
100 QCOM@$40
|
-$4,000
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
$10,000
|
|
CASH
|
$14,000
|

|
|
Long positions
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
Short positions
|
|
|
100 QCOM@$60
|
-$6,000
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
$8,000
|
In this way, a short position moves in the opposite
direction to the stock movement.
For another example we will look at EMC stock, an extraordinary
short sale case study:

The chart above of EMC in Feb 2001 shows a strong
countertrend rally and failure to penetrate the moving average. This is a
classic setup for a short sale. Let’s enter a short position at of 100 shares
EMC@ 70 and follow it through the stages of this stock’s massive decline.
|
CASH
|
$17,000
|

|
|
Long positions
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
Short positions
|
|
|
100 EMC @$70
|
-$7,000
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL 2/5/01
|
$10,000
|
Two months later in April 2001 EMC had fallen to
$30, a staggering decline. This raised the value of the short account to
$14,000.
|
CASH
|
$17,000
|

|
|
Long positions
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
Short positions
|
|
|
100 EMC @$70
|
-$3,000
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL 4/1/01
|
$14,000
|
Many stunned investors considered EMC a screaming buy
at $30 so a rally quickly followed. This bear market rally in EMC stalled at
$40. This looks like another setup for further decline, so we decide to sell
short an additional 100 shares of EMC @40.
|
CASH
|
$21,000
|

|
|
Long positions
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
Short positions
|
|
|
200 EMC @$40
|
-$8,000
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL 5/15/01
|
$13,000
|
The rally did not hold and EMC fell back down to $30.
|
CASH
|
$21,000
|

|
|
Long positions
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
Short positions
|
|
|
200 EMC @$30
|
-$6,000
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL 7/15/01
|
$15,000
|
By the beginning of 2002, EMC stock had fallen even
further to 13 and the short account rose in value to $18,400 for an unrealized gain
of $8,400 over less than one year.
|
CASH
|
$21,000
|

|
|
Long positions
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
Short positions
|
|
|
200 EMC @$13
|
-$2,600
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL 1/2/01
|
$18,400
|
EMC stock kept dropping and ended up below $5 during
2002. Our EMC short sales during that period of time would have doubled the value
of this hypothetical account. Declines of this magnitude are not uncommon in
long-term bear markets. Many stocks have fared even worse than EMC. The
examples above show how short selling can exploit these stock declines for
profit.
Short positions exhibit a different risk profile
than long positions. The maximum gain on a short sale is achieved if the stock
goes to zero. The loss potential is unlimited if an investor allows a shorted
stock to rise without covering. Therefore a short position has limited gain but
unlimited loss potential. A long position has unlimited gain potential but risk
of loss is limited only to the amount invested. This leads many investors to
believe that short selling is inherently riskier than going long. Short selling
is indeed very risky when practiced during a raging bull market, but going long
can be devastating during a vicious bear market. Stocks tend to fall faster
than they rise. Many investors have made fortunes selling short in bear
markets. Carefully executed short sales with stop-loss protection in a bear
market context carries risk, but being long may be riskier in a vicious bear
market.
Short selling provides a powerful tool to the
investor. With short selling, the investor can profit from stock declines and
turn a difficult bear market into an extraordinary opportunity. Long-term
studies of the markets have shown that stock markets rise about 2/3 of the
time. This means that 1/3 of the time stock markets decline in so-called secular
bear markets. During these secular bear markets, it is pointless to be long
stocks because very few will show a profit and it is unlikely that most
investors will be smart or lucky enough to hold those few. Bear markets are
usually shorter than bull markets and move much more rapidly. Stocks fall
faster than they rise because fear is a much greater motivator than greed.
Short selling can provide extraordinary profits for nimble investors who seize
the appropriate short opportunities.
For many people, short selling sounds somewhat
ghoulish, kind of like dancing on the bones of dying stocks. Some have even
called it unpatriotic. It is true that short sellers profit from the woes of
unlucky or mismanaged companies. It is also true that profits from a short sale
come from the losses of other investors. Short selling is a zero sum game. This
leads many people to believe that short selling is unethical or at least sleazy
and exploitive.
The truth is that most stock investing in secondary markets
is a zero-sum game. A company typically issues stock in an Initial Public
Offering (IPO) to raise funds for expansion. An IPO is true investment because
the funds are being used to finance plant and equipment to run a productive
enterprise. From that point on however, the stock trades on an exchange, which
is also known as a secondary market. Secondary markets are where
investors trade securities with each other. This company that issued the stock
will not directly gain from the trade of previously issued stock. (Although a
high stock price can certainly help a company in other ways.) When an investor
purchases a stock on an exchange, it is purchased from another investor who
also purchased the stock on an exchange. Capital gains from the sale of a stock
come from the higher price that the next buyer is willing to pay. The only true
non-zero sum gains in stock investing come from either dividends or buyout
where another firm purchases the shares and retires them from trading.
Since few stocks deliver dividends or get bought out,
most stock is traded solely for the purpose of capital gains. These capital
gains come at the expense of other investors. Maybe not today, but sometime in
the future some hapless investor will lose the money that you just made on a
stock trade. So what is different about short selling? Nothing really. Profit
derived from short selling is acquired at the expense of other investors, just
like selling a long position.
Short selling is an essential component to healthy
markets. Short sellers add additional liquidity to markets and help stabilize
them. Short sellers covering their positions can actually stop a stock from
falling precipitously. If there is a substantial short position in a stock that
is falling, short sellers will be purchasing the stock to close positions. In
some cases, short sellers may be the only buyers. This moderates declines.
Short sellers can also cause sharp rallies known as short squeezes. This
can happen when good news comes out about a heavily shorted stock causing the
short sellers to cover all at once. This is why a large short interest in a
stock can be considered a supportive indicator.
Informed stock investors know that short selling is
neither good nor evil. It is just another tool to profit from market
fluctuations. Successful investing demands that profits be extracted during
both good markets and bad. Nobody can make money being long a stock that is
declining. If most stocks are declining, being long any stock is a risky
position. It is self-defeating to hold losing stock positions based on false
ethics. It is not patriotic to lose money by holding declining stocks. Don’t
be a victim! Use all of the investment tools available to defend and enhance
your wealth.
Regardless of market conditions, most investors are
overwhelmingly long. Few ever trade short. Short selling is truly the road less
traveled. Cocktail conversations about stocks are typically brag sessions about
being long a stock that went to the moon. When was the last time you heard
someone brag about a spectacular short sale? The next time you are at a party,
try telling your best short-sale story and see what kind of reaction you get.
Hopefully, your friends will be polite.
Even though there is nothing illegal or unethical
about short selling, it is still regarded in popular culture as a rogue
practice. Many people consider it unpatriotic to sell short the country’s
finest firms and profit from their troubles. Short sellers have always created
resentment, particularly during bear markets when the majority of investors
have lost large sums of money.
Stock investing is fundamentally an optimistic
pursuit. Most people have a natural tendency to be optimistic. Short selling
goes contrary to that natural tendency. This may be why short sellers are
mistrusted. Short sellers are not necessarily pessimistic, they are just
identifying a trend and profiting from it.
One of the most famous short
sellers on Wall Street was Jesse Livermore who emerged from the 1929 crash with
almost $100 million. Jesse certainly caused a lot of resentment among all of
the ordinary people who had lost fortunes in the crash. Some even blamed Jesse
and other short sellers for the crash. In response to investor outrage, the
stock exchanges enacted rules to limit short selling that remain to this day.
After the crash, Livermore often received personal threats and was forced to
hire bodyguards. Sadly, Jesse lost his entire fortune in a mistimed investment
strategy a few years later and eventually committed suicide. The tragic story
of Jesse Livermore has become a parable for the “evils” of short selling.
Other well-known bears have
been teased and ridiculed during bull markets, then shunned and reviled when
their bearish predictions came true. Bearish analyst Jim Grant endured years of
ribbing by Louis Ruckeyser on the Wall $treet Week television show during the
long bull market. The same Mr. Ruckeyser fired “permabear” analyst Gail Dudack
just months before the stock market peak in April 2000. The unfortunate Ms.
Dudack disappeared into obscurity just as her bearish forecasts proved correct.
Professional stock analysts know that a bearish outlook may permanently ruin a
promising career. This may be why bullish analysts vastly outnumber bearish
ones. There is little room on Wall Street for a bear.
Stock market bears are always
in a battle with a perpetually bullish “Wall Street Industrial Complex”. These
institutions are designed to sell securities to the public so they are always
promoting stocks as safe and sound places to invest capital. Trading
commissions by short sellers generate little revenue for the brokerage
industry. In fact trading commissions in general are only a small part of
investment industry profits. Management fees, investment banking, research,
media, and a plethora of related activities make up the big money the
investment industry. These institutions need a constant inflow of new capital
to survive. Only a continuously bullish marketing message can lure investors to
buy these products and services.
This bullish message is
reinforced by the financial media who receive the bulk of their advertising
revenue from the same industry that is after your investment dollars. They have
created 24-hour “news” channels that are really nothing more than non-stop
infomercials for stock investing. Most people get their financial information
exclusively from these tainted sources. Financial media influence is powerful
and pervasive. Most common investors simply reflect the bullish perspective of
the information they receive from the media.
It is not the purpose of this
section to discourage purchasing stocks. Quite the contrary. Stock investing is
an essential part of a healthy economy. But there is a time to buy and a time
to sell. The media will tell you that anytime is the right time to buy but will
never tell you when to sell. Successful investors listen to the message of the
markets, not the talking heads on the cable news network. The financial media
will give no comfort or assistance to short sellers or any other species of the
bear family. Short sellers must think independently and not be influenced by
the media-controlled stock market pop culture.
It is important to remember that
other investors may resent all of the money you have made selling their
favorite stocks short. You are on the other side of most investor’s trades and
making all o