The Assault on Free Markets
By Peter Schiff
Those blindsided by
the recent financial meltdown are now loudly blaming the free market for its
failure to police its own excesses, and are calling for greater regulation to
prevent future disasters. But for those
who clearly observed the problems developing (in high definition slow motion)
the blame can be directed squarely at the policies of the Greenspan/Bernanke
Federal Reserve. As has been the case countless times in history, the
free market will now pay the price for government incompetence.
In Senate hearings
this week, all parties involved completely ignored the Fed’s own culpability in
igniting the speculative fever. It’s as
if a senior prom had turned into a wild bacchanalia, and angry parents now
question why the chaperones failed to notice the disrobing or why the DJ played
provocative music, all the while ignoring the bearded gentleman pouring grain alcohol
into the punch bowl.
A perfect
illustration of the Fed’s failure to take responsibility can be found in Bernanke’s
explanations regarding inflation, which he solely attributes to the effects of
the rapid increase in global commodity prices. He failed to mention that
commodity prices are rising as a direct consequence of his monetary policy,
which is debasing not just the U.S. dollar, but currencies around the
world. Rather than accepting the blame for creating inflation, Bernanke
is shifting the blame to the free market. The Senators are happy to let
him get away with it as it provides more evidence to support the “need “ for
more government to save the economy from the disastrous effects of unbridled
capitalism.
When asked how we
got into this mess, Bernanke replied that our problems resulted from an
excessive credit bubble characterized by aggressive leverage, reckless lending,
and extreme risk taking. Absent from his explanation was the Fed’s role
in irresponsibly setting interest rates below market levels, which mispriced
risk, got the party started and kept it raging into the wee hours of the morning.
The expressed goal of the Fed for much of this decade was, and is, to encourage
and facilitate borrowing and lending.
During his testimony,
Bernanke continued to claim that Bear Steams was not bailed out as shareholders
only received about $10 per share. Of course, $10 is better than zero,
which is what they surely would have received if the Fed hadn’t thrown taxpayer
money around. What about Bear’s
creditors though? Although the collapse of Bear Stearns would have cost
bond holders dearly, the bailout essentially makes them whole. Here again,
the Fed creates even greater moral hazards by encouraging excessive risk
taking. By bailing out lenders who extend excessive credit, the Fed
simply invites more of that behavior. The free market must be allowed to
properly price risk. Lenders need to know that when they lend money,
whether to highly leveraged investment banks and hedge funds, or to
over-stretched homebuyers or credit card users, they risk not getting paid
back. By interfering with this process the Fed simply guarantees more
losses and even bigger bailouts in the future.
Also, leveraged
speculators need to know that it is not “heads they win, tails the taxpayers
lose”. Wall Street executives amassed fortunes by making extremely risky
bets. Now that those bets have soured, why is it taxpayers that have to
swallow the losses? Wall Street billionaires earn their bucks on the
backs of the middle class, who made little on the way up, but foot the entire
bill on the way down.
While Bernanke talked
about the underlying strength of our economy, he claimed necessity in saving
Bear Stearns from bankruptcy as it would have brought down our entire financial
system. How sound can our economy be if the failure of one investment
bank could topple it? Does this now mean that no more major banks or
brokerage firms will be allowed to fail? Since we routinely accused Japan of practicing “crony capitalism” what do you
suppose we should call our version?
Not to be outdone in
rewarding reckless behavior, earlier in the week Congress passed $15 billion in
tax breaks for homebuilders, who had made their fortunes overbuilding during
the bubble and unloading their shares to a gullible public. By threatening to hold back on their political
contributions, these same homebuilders are awarded still more
billions. The last ones we should be subsidizing are
homebuilders. After all, the last thing we need right now is more homes.
The legislation also
contained a provision that offers generous tax credits to individuals who buy
homes out of foreclosure. While this is
billed as a benefit to homebuyers, it is just another hand out to lenders, as
those qualifying for the tax breaks will simply pay more at auctions as the tax
breaks subsidize higher bids. The real winners are the creditors who get
more in foreclosure than would have been the case had buyers not had their bids
subsidized by the government.
Of course, for all
the talk about taxpayer bailouts, none of the senators bothered to mention that,
for the moment, no tax increases are actually on the table. Instead, the
bailouts are being financed by savers, pensioners, wage earners, investors and
the elderly on fixed incomes, who all suffer staggering increases in their
costs of living, as the Fed uses inflation to rob Main Street to pay off Wall Street.
For a more in depth analysis of our financial problems and
the inherent dangers they pose for the U.S. economy and U.S. dollar denominated
investments, read my new book “Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic
Collapse.” Click here to order
a copy today.
More importantly, don’t wait
for reality to set in. Protect your wealth and preserve your purchasing
power before it’s too late. Discover the best way to buy gold at www.goldyoucanfold.com
, download my free research report on the powerful case for investing in
foreign equities available at www.researchreportone.com
, and subscribe to my free, on-line investment newsletter at http://www.europac.net/newsletter/newsletter.asp